We live by despair. Unamuno, Life 6.16
Unamuno
does not want to discuss doubt and hope in political or even ethical
terms. What he is most interested in is our existential feeling: how
do we handle not knowing the outcome of our life?
¿Y
qué sino la incertidumbre, la duda, la voz de la razón era el
abismo, el gouffre
terrible ante el que temblaba Pascal? Y ello fué lo
que le llevó a formular su terrible sentencia: il
faut s’abêtir, ¡hay que entontecerse!
Todo
el jansenismo, adaptación católica del calvinismo, lleva este mismo
sello. Aquel Port Royal que se debía a un vasco, el abate de
Saint-Cyran, vasco como Íñigo de Loyola, y como el que estas líneas
traza, lleva siempre en su fondo un sedimento de desesperación
religiosa, de suicidio de la razón. También Íñigo la mató en la
obediencia.
Por
desesperación se afirma, por desesperación se niega, y por ella se
abstiene uno de afirmar y de negar. Observad a los más de nuestros
ateos, y veréis que lo son por rabia, por rabia de no poder creer
que haya Dios. Son enemigos personales de Dios. Han sustantivado y
personalizado la Nada, y su no Dios es un Anti-Dios.
Y
nada hemos de decir de aquella frase abyecta e innoble de «si no
hubiera Dios habría que inventarlo». Esta es la expresión del
inmundo escepticismo de los conservadores, de los que estiman que la
religión es un resorte de gobierno, y cuyo interés es que haya en
la otra vida infierno para los que aquí se oponen a sus intereses
mundanos. Esa repugnante frase de saduceo es digna del incrédulo
adulador de poderosos a quien se atribuye.
No,
no es ese el hondo sentido vital. No se trata de una policía
trascendente, no de asegurar el orden —¡vaya un orden!— en la
tierra con amenazas de castigos y halagos de premios eternos después
de la muerte. Todo esto es muy bajo, es decir, no más que política,
o si se quiere ética. Se trata de vivir.
What
was the abyss of Pascal, the terrible gulf before which he trembled,
if not uncertainty, doubt, and the voice of reason? The sight of
these things caused him to utter his awful judgment: “We
must become fools!” (†).
All
Jansenism carries this same seal, betraying the Calvinist bent of its
Catholicism. Port Royal owes its reputation to a Basque, the abbot of
Saint-Cyran (‡), who resembles another Basque, Ignatius of Loyola
(*), in that his profession of faith carries in its lees a sediment
of religious despair, of reason destroying itself. Ignatius also
killed his reason with obedience.
Despair
is the source of our affirmations and denials, and it is by despair
also that we refrain from affirming or denying. Observe most of our
atheists, and you will see that they are atheist because they are
angry: furious that they cannot contrive to believe that God exists.
They are personal enemies of God. They have substantiated and
personified Nothing, and this not-God is their anti-God.
There
is nothing to say here about that vile and ignoble dictum, that if
God did not exist, we would have to invent him (⁑).
This expression rises from the
unclean skepticism of traditionalists, conservatives for whom
religion is a tool of government. They want hell to exist in another
life for those who oppose their mundane interests here. This
disgusting phrase, reeking of
the Sadducees, is worthy of the unbeliever to whom it is credited, a
man known for worshipping those in power.
No!
All this misses the deep and vital meaning here. We are not
discussing transcendental politics, securing order on earth—and
what an order it is!—with threats of eternal punishment and
promises of similar reward, after death. All this is very low,
nothing more than politics, or ethics, if you prefer. We are talking
about life.
---
(†)
I haven't discovered this
particular phrase in Pascal's oeuvre, but it does echo a passage in
the Thoughts wherein
the reader is told that learning faith from the faithful will render
him foolish (Pensées 2.233).
(‡)
Jean du Vergier de Hauranne
(1581-1643) befriended Cornelius Jansen (1585-1638) early in their
clerical careers: they
shared a mystical approach to
Catholic faith, and a deep interest
in the church fathers, notably Augustine (who provided the
inspiration for Jansen's magnum opus, Augustinus).
Their church work took them
from Paris to Bayonne, Vergier's
birthplace. When
they left Bayonne (Jansen in 1616, Vergier in 1617), Jansen went to
teach theology at the college of Saint Pulcheria in Leuven, and
Vergier departed for the abbey of Saint-Cyran, as
abbot. He
later became the director and confessor of the nuns at the abbey of
Port-Royal des Champs, which became a headquarters for the teaching
and practice of an Augustinian theology that its arch-enemies, the Jesuits, called
Jansenism (after Cornelius Jansen). Pope Innocent X issued an
apostolic constitution condemning Jansenism in 1653.
(*)
Íñigo López de Oñaz y Loyola (1491-1556) was born in the Loyola
castle in Gipuzkoa, one of thirteen children in a family of minor
Basque nobles. His military career ended dramatically at the Battle
of Pamplona (20 May 1521), when an army of French and Navarrese
stormed the castle he held for Castile, and a musket-ball shattered
his leg. He healed lame, and became very devout, going on pilgrimage
to the Holy Land, seeing visions, and eventually securing the
approval of Pope Paul III for the foundation of a new religious
order: the Society of Jesus, known commonly as the Jesuits. To them
he bequeathed a discipline comprising many different spiritual
exercises or rituals for cultivating devotion. Unamuno's comparing
him to the abbot of Saint-Cyran is not without irony, as the Jesuits
and the Jansenists were resolutely opposed to one another.
(⁑)
Si Dieu n'existait pas, il faudrait l'inventer. This
line comes from a poem by Voltaire: Epître à l'auteur du
livre des Trois imposteurs,
published in 1768. Unamuno
compares him to the Jewish Sadducees, who controlled
the temple of Jerusalem in the wake of the Maccabean revolt and
denied the resurrection of the soul.