Doubt: our greatest gift? Unamuno, Life 6.13
Unamuno
explains that he finds doubt fundamental to the human condition. It
is normal for us to doubt, no matter what we happen to believe, or
how that belief finds expression in the activity of our life. To be
without doubts, he thinks, is to be in some sense inhuman
(monstruous, obscene, deformed).
La
certeza absoluta, completa, de que la muerte es un completo y
definitivo e irrevocable anonadamiento de la conciencia personal, una
certeza de ello como estamos ciertos de que los tres ángulos de un
triángulo valen dos rectos, o la certeza absoluta, completa, de que
nuestra conciencia personal se prolonga más allá de la muerte en
estas o las otras condiciones, haciendo sobre todo entrar en ello la
extraña y adventicia añadidura del premio o del castigo eternos,
ambas certezas nos harían igualmente imposible la vida. En un
escondrijo, el más recóndito del espíritu, sin saberlo acaso el
mismo que cree estar convencido de que con la muerte acaba para
siempre su conciencia personal, su memoria, en aquel escondrijo le
queda una sombra, una vaga sombra, una sombra de sombra de
incertidumbre, y mientras él se dice: «ea, ¡a vivir esta vida
pasajera, que no hay otra!», el silencio de aquel escondrijo le
dice: «¡quién sabe!...» Cree acaso no oirlo, pero lo oye. Y en un
repliegue también del alma del creyente que guarde más fe en la
vida futura hay una voz tapada, voz de incertidumbre, que le
cuchichea al oído, espiritual: «¡quién sabe!...» Son estas voces
acaso como el zumbar de un mosquito cuando el vendaval brama entre
los árboles del bosque; no nos damos cuenta de ese zumbido y, sin
embargo, junto con el fragor de la tormenta, nos llega al oído.
¿Cómo podríamos vivir, si no, sin esa incertidumbre?
El
«¿y si hay?» y el «¿y si no hay?» son las bases de nuestra vida
íntima. Acaso haya racionalista que nunca haya vacilado en su
convicción de la mortalidad del alma, y vitalista que no haya
vacilado en su fe en la inmortalidad; pero eso sólo querrá decir a
lo sumo que así como hay monstruos, hay también estúpidos
afectivos o de sentimiento, por mucha inteligencia que tengan, y
estúpidos intelectuales, por mucha que su virtud sea. Mas en lo
normal no puedo creer a los que me aseguren que nunca, ni en un
parpadeo el más fugaz, ni en las horas de mayor soledad y
tribulación, se les ha aflorado a la conciencia ese rumor de la
incertidumbre. No comprendo a los hombres que me dicen que nunca les
atormentó la perspectiva del allende la muerte, ni el anonadamiento
propio les inquieta; y por mi parte no quiero poner paz entre mi
corazón y mi cabeza, entre mi fe y mi razón; quiero más bien que
se peleen entre sí.
Absolute
certainties would make our lives impossible. Imagine for a moment
that we are utterly certain, with no room at all for doubt, that
death represents a total, definitive, and irrevocable annihilation of
personal consciousness—and we know this as surely as we know that
the sum of three angles in a triangle is the same as the sum of two
right angles. Now, imagine us similarly sure that our personal
conscience endures beyond death, in conditions like these or in some
other conditions, with the strange and unusual addition of eternal
reward and punishment. In either case, life as we know it becomes
impossible. Without even being aware of it himself, the man
thoroughly convinced of his own mortality keeps a vague shadow of a
doubt buried deep in his mind, in the farthest hidden corner of his
consciousness. While he says to himself, “Go to then! Live this
fleeting life, for there is no other!” this hidden shadow of a
shadow mutters a very different tale in the silence of his mind: “Who
knows?” The man might think he doesn't hear it, but he does. We
find a very similar situation in the soul of the most fervent
believer, the one with most faith in a future life. Here too is a
quiet voice, a voice of doubt cutting at his spiritual ears: “Who
knows?” These voices may be likened to the buzz of a mosquito in
the midst of a windstorm wreaking havoc among the trees of the
forest. We don't hear the buzz distinctly in the midst of the
crashing storm, but still it reaches our ears somehow. How could
things be different, really? How could we live without this anchor of
uncertainty?
At
the foundation of our most private life lie questions: “Is there
more? Is this it?” Perhaps there exists somewhere a rationalist who
has never wavered in his conviction of the soul's mortality, and a
vitalist whose faith in immortality has never faltered. This will
amount to nothing more than a recognition of extreme aberrations: as
there exist people with shocking physical deformities, so there are
outliers among us with very deformed minds. Some are emotional
idiots, in spite of all the rational intelligence they possess, and
others are rational dolts, for all that they have great emotional
virtue. But in the normal shape of things, I cannot believe those who
assure me that they have never been reached by the rumor of
doubt—that its flower has never bloomed in their minds, not even
for the briefest of moments, when they were most lonely and
afflicted. I do not understand men who tell me that the prospect of
the afterlife never tormented them, or that they never shuddered to
contemplate their own annihilation. For my own part, I do not wish to
impose peace on my heart and my head, on my faith and my reason. I
prefer that they fight each other without stint.